About Me

I'm a PhD student researching the role of the archaeological dead in contemporary British society. Think of this as a scrapbook of all the interesting links, snippets of information and random bits and bobs I come across pertaining to death, dying and the dead. Enjoy?!

Instagram Shots

    See more

    More liked posts

    How has the human skull evolved?

    Genetically determined morphological integration directs the evolution of skull shape in humans. The study is based on the analysis of 390 skulls, decorated according to local tradition, from the ossuary in Hallstatt, Austria which houses an exceptionally valuable collection for anthropological research.

    The more than 700 items of skeletal remains are famous for their painted decoration, depicting flowers, leaves and crosses, with the name of the deceased printed on the forehead of most of the skulls. By cross-referencing with local registers of births, deaths and marriages, experts have been able to use the collection to reconstruct the genealogical relationships of the population from as far back as the 17th century and make informed estimates of the influence of genes on skull shape.

    Fascinating stuff! Click the link to read more…

    Who wants to live forever? Computer model predicts that if humans became 'immortal' it might actually be bad news...

    Ageing and death are not something human beings generally look forward to - but, paradoxically, we may have ‘evolved’ ageing to help us survive.

    Using computer simulations of two ‘competing’ populations, evolutionary biologist Andre Martins of Brazil’s University of Sao Paolo ‘proved’ that under some conditions, it could be an advantage to age and die. 

    Not for the individuals concerned, of course - for the species as a whole.

    First out of Africa, first into Asia and Australia…

The first major genome analysis of Australian Aboriginal people reveals that their ancestors took part in the first human migration out of Africa.
They were the first to arrive in Asia some 70,000 years ago, roaming the area at least 24,000 years before the ancestors of present-day Europeans and Asians appeared. They were also the first to live in Australia, according to DNA results of a 90-year-old hair sample of a young man that link Aborigines to the first inhabitants of  the region about 50,000 years ago.

Just…wow.

    First out of Africa, first into Asia and Australia…

    The first major genome analysis of Australian Aboriginal people reveals that their ancestors took part in the first human migration out of Africa.

    They were the first to arrive in Asia some 70,000 years ago, roaming the area at least 24,000 years before the ancestors of present-day Europeans and Asians appeared. They were also the first to live in Australia, according to DNA results of a 90-year-old hair sample of a young man that link Aborigines to the first inhabitants of  the region about 50,000 years ago.

    Just…wow.

    skepttv:

    Laetoli Footprints

    The Laetoli footprints were formed and preserved by a chance combination of events — a volcanic eruption, a rainstorm, and another ashfall. When they were found in 1976, these hominid tracks, at least 3.6 million years old, were some of the oldest evidence then known for upright bipedal walking, a major milestone in human evolution. Paleoanthropologist and consultant forensic scientist Owen Lovejoy compares the ancient biped prints with those of modern humans and chimpanzees.

    Thank goodness for the irrepressible urge of humans (and other animals) to joke and play around in nearly any situation. Sometimes, it pays big dividends. It certainly did in 1976, when paleoanthropologist Andrew Hill and a colleague were tossing elephant dung at each other in Laetoli, a hominid archeological site in Tanzania. As Hill dived out of the way, he stumbled on what turned out to be one of the wonders of prehistoric finds: a trail of hominid footprints about 3.6 million years old.

    The majority of the Laetoli footprint site was excavated in 1978. Until then, the oldest known footprints of human ancestors were tens of thousands of years old. But this trail, some 80 feet long and preserved in cementlike volcanic ash, had been made by some of the first upright-walking hominids. An almost unimaginable sequence of events preserved what paleontologist Ian Tattersall calls a fossil of human behavior — prehistoric walking.

    Initially, a nearby volcano called Sadiman erupted a cloud of fine ash, like beach sand, that left a layer on the landscape. Then a light rain fell onto the ash to create something like wet cement — an ideal material for trapping footprints. Birds and mammals left a great number of prints, but, spectacularly, so did a pair of hominids, one large and one small, trekking across the ash. (Some analysts conclude that it is possible to detect the trail of a third, smaller individual whose tracks overlap the footprints left by one of the others.) A subsequent eruption from Sadiman dropped more ash, sealing the footprints like a laminated driver’s license. Finally, erosion over millions of years unveiled the prints for Hill and other researchers in Mary Leakey’s group to discover.

    The prints, say experts on hominid body structure, are strikingly different from those of a chimpanzee, and in fact are hardly distinguishable from those of modern humans. The only known hominid fossils of that age in that location are those of Lucy and her kind, the small-brained but upright-walking hominids classified as Australopithecus afarensis. Some analysts have noted that the smaller of the two clearest trails bears telltale signs that suggest whoever left the prints was burdened on one side — perhaps a female carrying an infant on her hip. While the detailed interpretation of the prints remains a matter of debate, they remain an extraordinary and fascinating fossil find, preserving a moment in prehistoric time.

    (Source: youtube.com, via alphacaeli)

    Scienceline has a 5-minute podcast about a new theory on the origins of disgust. Most scientists think there are four categories of disgust:

    1. Core disgust: protects the body from contamination (“dirt, mold, and sick people”).

    2. Interpersonal disgust: protects the soul and social order (“promiscuous sex”).

    3. Moral disgust: protects society (“stealing or cheating”)

    4. Animal reminder disgust: protects the soul from recognizing the body’s animal nature. (“Death, wounds, corpses, sexuality”).

    But Joshua Tybur, a psychologist at the University of New Mexico doesn’t think these categories are correct, at least not from an evolutionary standpoint…

    (Source: Boing Boing / Scienceline)